ABT vs DXCM

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) and Dexcom (DXCM) compared side by side. Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is larger, with a market cap of $179.4B versus $29.4B for Dexcom, about 6.1 times the size. On trailing earnings, DXCM is cheaper at 30.9x versus 38.6x for ABT.

Head to head

MetricABTDXCM
Market cap$179.4B$29.4B
P/E (TTM)38.6x30.9x
Forward P/E17.4x25.0x
Revenue (TTM)$48.2B$5.0B
Revenue growth14.5%13.1%
Gross margin57.1%62.5%
Operating margin11.3%24.3%
Free cash flow$7.4B$1.4B
Dividend yield2.43%None
1-year return-15.9%+9.7%
5-year return (annual)-2.0%-11.3%
Max drawdown-46%-95%
FI Handbook gradeC+B+

Highlighted: the stronger figure on metrics where higher or lower is clearly better.

Growth of $10,000 (5 years, price only)

$5.0K
$7.5K
$10.0K
20222023202420252026
ABTDXCM

ABT vs DXCM FAQ

Which is bigger, ABT or DXCM?

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is larger, with a market cap of $179.4B versus $29.4B for Dexcom, about 6.1 times the size.

Is ABT or DXCM cheaper?

On trailing earnings, DXCM is cheaper at 30.9x versus 38.6x for ABT. A lower P/E can reflect slower expected growth, so compare growth and margins too.

Which stock performed better over the past year, ABT or DXCM?

DXCM returned +9.7% over the past year including dividends, versus -15.9% for ABT, through October 23, 2026.

Which pays a higher dividend, ABT or DXCM?

ABT yields 2.43%; DXCM does not pay a dividend.

Full pages: Abbott Laboratories · Dexcom