AFL vs MET
Aflac (AFL) and MetLife (MET) compared side by side. MetLife (MET) is larger, with a market cap of $62.8B versus $60.4B for Aflac, about 1.0 times the size. On trailing earnings, AFL is cheaper at 13.0x versus 18.9x for MET.
Head to head
| Metric | AFL | MET |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $60.4B | $62.8B |
| P/E (TTM) | 13.0x | 18.9x |
| Forward P/E | 15.8x | 8.9x |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18.1B | $79.4B |
| Revenue growth | -1.0% | 10.5% |
| Gross margin | 50.9% | 24.0% |
| Operating margin | 25.7% | 5.5% |
| Free cash flow | $2.6B | $15.6B |
| Dividend yield | 2.02% | 2.40% |
| 1-year return | +14.4% | +30.0% |
| 5-year return (annual) | +19.0% | +11.8% |
| Max drawdown | -83% | -82% |
| FI Handbook grade | B- | B- |
Highlighted: the stronger figure on metrics where higher or lower is clearly better.
Growth of $10,000 (5 years, price only)
$10.0K
$15.0K
$20.0K
20222023202420252026
AFL vs MET FAQ
Which is bigger, AFL or MET?
MetLife (MET) is larger, with a market cap of $62.8B versus $60.4B for Aflac, about 1.0 times the size.
Is AFL or MET cheaper?
On trailing earnings, AFL is cheaper at 13.0x versus 18.9x for MET. A lower P/E can reflect slower expected growth, so compare growth and margins too.
Which stock performed better over the past year, AFL or MET?
MET returned +30.0% over the past year including dividends, versus +14.4% for AFL, through October 23, 2026.
Which pays a higher dividend, AFL or MET?
MET yields 2.40% versus 2.02% for AFL.