COST vs STZ

Costco (COST) and Constellation Brands (STZ) compared side by side. Costco (COST) is larger, with a market cap of $444.6B versus $23.5B for Constellation Brands, about 18.9 times the size. On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper at 12.4x versus 48.3x for COST.

Head to head

MetricCOSTSTZ
Market cap$444.6B$23.5B
P/E (TTM)48.3x12.4x
Forward P/E40.1x11.5x
Revenue (TTM)$303.2B$9.2B
Revenue growth11.1%6.1%
Gross margin12.8%52.8%
Operating margin3.8%33.6%
Free cash flow$9.4B$1.8B
Dividend yield0.59%2.97%
1-year return+7.1%+2.2%
5-year return (annual)+17.0%-7.0%
Max drawdown-62%-67%
FI Handbook gradeC-B

Highlighted: the stronger figure on metrics where higher or lower is clearly better.

Growth of $10,000 (5 years, price only)

$10.0K
$20.0K
20222023202420252026
COSTSTZ

COST vs STZ FAQ

Which is bigger, COST or STZ?

Costco (COST) is larger, with a market cap of $444.6B versus $23.5B for Constellation Brands, about 18.9 times the size.

Is COST or STZ cheaper?

On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper at 12.4x versus 48.3x for COST. A lower P/E can reflect slower expected growth, so compare growth and margins too.

Which stock performed better over the past year, COST or STZ?

COST returned +7.1% over the past year including dividends, versus +2.2% for STZ, through October 23, 2026.

Which pays a higher dividend, COST or STZ?

STZ yields 2.97% versus 0.59% for COST.

Full pages: Costco · Constellation Brands