DXCM vs ISRG

Dexcom (DXCM) and Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) compared side by side. Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) is larger, with a market cap of $159.8B versus $29.4B for Dexcom, about 5.4 times the size. On trailing earnings, DXCM is cheaper at 30.9x versus 54.7x for ISRG.

Head to head

MetricDXCMISRG
Market cap$29.4B$159.8B
P/E (TTM)30.9x54.7x
Forward P/E25.0x36.4x
Revenue (TTM)$5.0B$11.6B
Revenue growth13.1%21.7%
Gross margin62.5%66.6%
Operating margin24.3%33.3%
Free cash flow$1.4B$3.2B
Dividend yieldNoneNone
1-year return+9.7%-18.0%
5-year return (annual)-11.3%+5.8%
Max drawdown-95%-82%
FI Handbook gradeB+B

Highlighted: the stronger figure on metrics where higher or lower is clearly better.

Growth of $10,000 (5 years, price only)

$5.0K
$10.0K
$15.0K
20222023202420252026
DXCMISRG

DXCM vs ISRG FAQ

Which is bigger, DXCM or ISRG?

Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) is larger, with a market cap of $159.8B versus $29.4B for Dexcom, about 5.4 times the size.

Is DXCM or ISRG cheaper?

On trailing earnings, DXCM is cheaper at 30.9x versus 54.7x for ISRG. A lower P/E can reflect slower expected growth, so compare growth and margins too.

Which stock performed better over the past year, DXCM or ISRG?

DXCM returned +9.7% over the past year including dividends, versus -18.0% for ISRG, through October 23, 2026.

Full pages: Dexcom · Intuitive Surgical