FSLR vs MU
First Solar (FSLR) and Micron Technology (MU) compared side by side. Micron Technology (MU) is larger, with a market cap of $992.9B versus $18.5B for First Solar, about 53.7 times the size. On trailing earnings, FSLR is cheaper at 10.6x versus 11.8x for MU.
Head to head
| Metric | FSLR | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $18.5B | $992.9B |
| P/E (TTM) | 10.6x | 11.8x |
| Forward P/E | 7.3x | 4.2x |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.4B | $133.2B |
| Revenue growth | -3.7% | 379.3% |
| Gross margin | 44.0% | 80.7% |
| Operating margin | 42.6% | 80.7% |
| Free cash flow | $1.5B | $59.0B |
| Dividend yield | None | 0.07% |
| 1-year return | -24.9% | +325.0% |
| 5-year return (annual) | +10.1% | +67.8% |
| Max drawdown | -96% | -98% |
| FI Handbook grade | B- | B+ |
Highlighted: the stronger figure on metrics where higher or lower is clearly better.
Growth of $10,000 (5 years, price only)
FSLR vs MU FAQ
Which is bigger, FSLR or MU?
Micron Technology (MU) is larger, with a market cap of $992.9B versus $18.5B for First Solar, about 53.7 times the size.
Is FSLR or MU cheaper?
On trailing earnings, FSLR is cheaper at 10.6x versus 11.8x for MU. A lower P/E can reflect slower expected growth, so compare growth and margins too.
Which stock performed better over the past year, FSLR or MU?
MU returned +325.0% over the past year including dividends, versus -24.9% for FSLR, through October 23, 2026.
Which pays a higher dividend, FSLR or MU?
MU yields 0.07%; FSLR does not pay a dividend.
Full pages: First Solar · Micron Technology