GWW vs PH
W. W. Grainger (GWW) and Parker Hannifin (PH) compared side by side. Parker Hannifin (PH) is larger, with a market cap of $111.1B versus $63.6B for W. W. Grainger, about 1.7 times the size. On trailing earnings, PH is cheaper at 30.9x versus 34.4x for GWW.
Head to head
| Metric | GWW | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $63.6B | $111.1B |
| P/E (TTM) | 34.4x | 30.9x |
| Forward P/E | 26.4x | 22.2x |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18.8B | $21.5B |
| Revenue growth | 10.3% | 9.8% |
| Gross margin | 39.4% | 37.5% |
| Operating margin | 16.1% | 23.5% |
| Free cash flow | $1.5B | $3.9B |
| Dividend yield | 0.74% | 0.91% |
| 1-year return | +41.2% | +15.9% |
| 5-year return (annual) | +26.5% | +25.7% |
| Max drawdown | -65% | -67% |
| FI Handbook grade | B- | C+ |
Highlighted: the stronger figure on metrics where higher or lower is clearly better.
Growth of $10,000 (5 years, price only)
GWW vs PH FAQ
Which is bigger, GWW or PH?
Parker Hannifin (PH) is larger, with a market cap of $111.1B versus $63.6B for W. W. Grainger, about 1.7 times the size.
Is GWW or PH cheaper?
On trailing earnings, PH is cheaper at 30.9x versus 34.4x for GWW. A lower P/E can reflect slower expected growth, so compare growth and margins too.
Which stock performed better over the past year, GWW or PH?
GWW returned +41.2% over the past year including dividends, versus +15.9% for PH, through October 23, 2026.
Which pays a higher dividend, GWW or PH?
PH yields 0.91% versus 0.74% for GWW.
Full pages: W. W. Grainger · Parker Hannifin