MET vs PFG
MetLife (MET) and Principal Financial (PFG) compared side by side. MetLife (MET) is larger, with a market cap of $62.8B versus $23.2B for Principal Financial, about 2.7 times the size. On trailing earnings, PFG is cheaper at 15.5x versus 18.9x for MET.
Head to head
| Metric | MET | PFG |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $62.8B | $23.2B |
| P/E (TTM) | 18.9x | 15.5x |
| Forward P/E | 8.9x | 10.6x |
| Revenue (TTM) | $79.4B | $15.7B |
| Revenue growth | 10.5% | 6.4% |
| Gross margin | 24.0% | 47.3% |
| Operating margin | 5.5% | 12.3% |
| Free cash flow | $15.6B | $4.9B |
| Dividend yield | 2.40% | 3.09% |
| 1-year return | +30.0% | +41.4% |
| 5-year return (annual) | +11.8% | +13.3% |
| Max drawdown | -82% | -92% |
| FI Handbook grade | B- | B+ |
Highlighted: the stronger figure on metrics where higher or lower is clearly better.
Growth of $10,000 (5 years, price only)
MET vs PFG FAQ
Which is bigger, MET or PFG?
MetLife (MET) is larger, with a market cap of $62.8B versus $23.2B for Principal Financial, about 2.7 times the size.
Is MET or PFG cheaper?
On trailing earnings, PFG is cheaper at 15.5x versus 18.9x for MET. A lower P/E can reflect slower expected growth, so compare growth and margins too.
Which stock performed better over the past year, MET or PFG?
PFG returned +41.4% over the past year including dividends, versus +30.0% for MET, through October 23, 2026.
Which pays a higher dividend, MET or PFG?
PFG yields 3.09% versus 2.40% for MET.
Full pages: MetLife · Principal Financial