MTB vs RF
M&T Bank (MTB) and Regions Financial (RF) compared side by side. M&T Bank (MTB) is larger, with a market cap of $32.0B versus $24.3B for Regions Financial, about 1.3 times the size. On trailing earnings, RF is cheaper at 11.2x versus 11.7x for MTB.
Head to head
| Metric | MTB | RF |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $32.0B | $24.3B |
| P/E (TTM) | 11.7x | 11.2x |
| Forward P/E | 10.5x | 10.0x |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.5B | $7.3B |
| Revenue growth | 0.5% | 5.2% |
| Gross margin | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Operating margin | 43.1% | 41.3% |
| Free cash flow | $3.6B | $1.8B |
| Dividend yield | 2.71% | 4.21% |
| 1-year return | +25.9% | +22.9% |
| 5-year return (annual) | +10.2% | +7.8% |
| Max drawdown | -73% | -93% |
| FI Handbook grade | C+ | B- |
Highlighted: the stronger figure on metrics where higher or lower is clearly better.
Growth of $10,000 (5 years, price only)
MTB vs RF FAQ
Which is bigger, MTB or RF?
M&T Bank (MTB) is larger, with a market cap of $32.0B versus $24.3B for Regions Financial, about 1.3 times the size.
Is MTB or RF cheaper?
On trailing earnings, RF is cheaper at 11.2x versus 11.7x for MTB. A lower P/E can reflect slower expected growth, so compare growth and margins too.
Which stock performed better over the past year, MTB or RF?
MTB returned +25.9% over the past year including dividends, versus +22.9% for RF, through October 23, 2026.
Which pays a higher dividend, MTB or RF?
RF yields 4.21% versus 2.71% for MTB.
Full pages: M&T Bank · Regions Financial