PH vs SNA
Parker Hannifin (PH) and Snap-on (SNA) compared side by side. Parker Hannifin (PH) is larger, with a market cap of $111.1B versus $18.5B for Snap-on, about 6.0 times the size. On trailing earnings, SNA is cheaper at 18.5x versus 30.9x for PH.
Head to head
| Metric | PH | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $111.1B | $18.5B |
| P/E (TTM) | 30.9x | 18.5x |
| Forward P/E | 22.2x | 17.0x |
| Revenue (TTM) | $21.5B | $5.3B |
| Revenue growth | 9.8% | -0.7% |
| Gross margin | 37.5% | 51.9% |
| Operating margin | 23.5% | 24.9% |
| Free cash flow | $3.9B | $1.1B |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 2.73% |
| 1-year return | +15.9% | +5.8% |
| 5-year return (annual) | +25.7% | +14.1% |
| Max drawdown | -67% | -70% |
| FI Handbook grade | C+ | B- |
Highlighted: the stronger figure on metrics where higher or lower is clearly better.
Growth of $10,000 (5 years, price only)
PH vs SNA FAQ
Which is bigger, PH or SNA?
Parker Hannifin (PH) is larger, with a market cap of $111.1B versus $18.5B for Snap-on, about 6.0 times the size.
Is PH or SNA cheaper?
On trailing earnings, SNA is cheaper at 18.5x versus 30.9x for PH. A lower P/E can reflect slower expected growth, so compare growth and margins too.
Which stock performed better over the past year, PH or SNA?
PH returned +15.9% over the past year including dividends, versus +5.8% for SNA, through October 23, 2026.
Which pays a higher dividend, PH or SNA?
SNA yields 2.73% versus 0.91% for PH.
Full pages: Parker Hannifin · Snap-on